Saturday, November 5, 2011

Blog #9- Freak Factor

http://changethis.com/manifesto/show/45.02.FreakFactor


The article entitled, “FREAK FACTOR: Discovering Uniqueness by Flaunting Weakness” by David Rendall was written to explain that all people have flaws, but is it really such a bad thing?  He then goes to list a lot of his own personal weaknesses and basically knowing your own weaknesses you find out clues to your true strengths.  I think that all of his suggestions are valid because it’s a new look at improving yourself.  Like figuring out your flaws is not meant to bring you down and you should know that nothing is wrong with you as a person.  This is an article designed to give you a step to bettering yourself or at least realizing that your individual self isn’t bad even with flaws.  I think that David Rendall’s nine suggestions are valid.  His first two steps are designed for you to figure out whats wrong and what needs to be fixed.  I could easily implement this strategy by making a list of all my flaws.  This would help me visually see what my weaknesses and even my strengths are and could be.  Then you must realize that these flaws don’t make you a bad person but can improve your qualities.  Next it states that you shouldn’t try to fix your weaknesses but you should build on your strengths.  Basically if you don’t use your strengths, you lose them.  I could implement this strategy in my Creative Life easily by using them in making movies, coming up with ideas, and laying out shots. 


I don’t know if I believe that some of his suggestions would be valid for trying to help us better ourselves.  Step 4: Forget it: Don’t try to fix your weaknesses is a step that I think doesn’t help.  I think that fixing your weaknesses can sometimes be worth trying to fix for bettering yourself.  Then two steps later it says that you can’t do both which I also think is incorrect.  Yes there isn’t a lot of time and energy you can use on both but still you can manage time well enough for it to work.  Also step 3 states that you should think of yourself as “Flawless: There’s nothing wrong with you” which I think is not a very good strategy to improve.  I think that identifying that you have flaws is the first step to fix whatever your weaknesses are.  Also you learn from your mistakes so if you don’t take a risk in fixing your flaws how can you ever gain if you don’t work at it.  I do think that your weaknesses make you unique from everyone else but also that if you use your strengths to your advantage you can become even greater.  David Rendall has some very good points suggested in his article of Discovering Uniqueness by Flaunting Weakness but a few of them can be given time to look at and revise.  Showing off your weaknesses is never a good tactic for someone but with work this strategy could help someone improve themselves overall.


Regarding the creative process, I think some of my strengths could be found in my preparation.  If I spent as much time preparing for a test, writing out a movie, or a speech as I did for actually doing the job I would have so much more potential.  I think that this makes me notice that a weakness of mine is my ability to take action.  I always talk about doing something but always get stuck at the step that really matters, getting the job done.  One of my strongest features is that I am very good at taking my laid out ideas and shooting them exactly how I thought it out.  This is a very difficult part of the creation of movies and I think it is one of my strengths that I need to focus on and use to the best of my ability.  One of my weaknesses is my writing ability for a script.  This is something that definitely has to improve.  I am going to try to surround myself with people that have good writing capabilities because in the article it states that you should find people who are strong where you are weak.  Another strength of mine is coming up with great ideas.  But with that my weakness can be attributed to not writing them down and never being able to work on it because of forgetting or just not enough time on my hands.  This helps me realize what I need to work on by seeing it on paper.

Blog #8- Brainwashed

http://changethis.com/manifesto/show/66.01.Brainwashed


“Be Generous” is a layer that basically says that you should get involved in things that don’t cost money, write an essay, make a song, ect.  This economy rewards people that give and help support one another.  This type of economy helps create new ideas and build faster.  The next layer after that is called, “Make Art” and it says that art is a way to make a difference and create a connection.  It also states that art isn’t always just a poem or drawing but it can be created by any of us.  The last layer is called, “Learn”.  This layer is the key of them all.  This layer says that you first go to school to learn trade then end up with the same job for the rest of your life, which is a joke.  This layer says you can always learn and take a new path.


I think that these Layers are connected to this blog creating for this quarter because the blogs are intended to help you get used to writing or critiquing on various forms of art and things related to art.  These layers of reinventing yourself are intentionally trying to give you insight into how to become more artistic and give you a view that you don’t normally see.  The last layer, “LEARN” definitely has a big connection to all the blogs because it basically says you can always learn you just have to give yourself a chance.  You pick the path that you are going to go down.  It’s all up to you.  These layers definitely can help make you a better person, artist, and/or student depending on how you use them.  By using the “Be Generous” layer it can make you become a better person by learning to give without planning on getting something back.  If people plan on always getting something back when they give then they don’t put all the effort into what their giving but if you learn to give without getting back you can create things way better than you could with your new mindset.  The “Make Art” layer can get you to become a better artist by informing you that art isn’t always the typical form of art and can made out of nothing.  It just takes time and ideas.  These blog assignments also help me get used to a new way to express my ideas.  I think that to “Learn” you must do it through mistakes.  I think that if you fail at something it is one of the best ways to gain knowledge of a subject and “fail” is one of the methods to reinvent yourself.  I also believe that the blogs help you create a form of art in our own way, through our own words.  This helps originate ideas.  I think these exercises can definitely better you as a person but truthfully it’s how you take the information given to you and how you choose to use it.  I chose Be Generous, Make Art, and Learn because those were the three layers that I read and really connected to me and I thought I could use for myself.  The “Brainwashed” article by Seth Godin is a great article that really can help you start on a new path to either better yourself or make yourself into someone new.  

Blog #7- Scene Deconstruction


                                                               "Get Off My Lawn"





I believe that the theme of this movie is how a racist old man overcomes his racism towards his Korean neighbors.  This trailer/scene shows Walt (Clint Eastwood) caring for the people he dislikes because of this gang that is harassing everyone in the neighborhood.  The scene shows Walt beating up, aiming a gun, and threatening these gang members to scare them so they stop messing with these innocent Korean neighbors.  The theme is definitely didactic because the narrator is Clint Eastwood through the whole movie and he speaks what he thinks is not unreliable.


This is the scene in Gran Torino where Walt comes out of his house because of these gang members beating on Thao and his family.  The director definitely used shape in the scene to make Walt appear more fierce than he is.  He is holding a gun that gives him more of a triangular shape giving him more power.  While the shape that is given to the gang members is round because the front gang member is more obese and has a very round head.  The shot over the shoulder of Walt towards the gang members makes them look weak because its at a downward angle and makes you focus on the fatter gang member because your eyes follow the line of the gun.  But the reverse shot of that makes Walt more powerful because it’s an upward angle towards Walts face and you also can follow the “line” formed by the gun to his face.  Movement is another used key element in this scene.  From start to finish Walt never stops edging forward towards the gang while it’s the opposite from start to finish for the gang, as they keep backing away from Walt and eventually run away.  The last element used is shadows, which make everyone of the gang members faces extremely dark and evil.  The lighting on Walts face is extremely light and gives him the persona of someone doing good.  This is one of the most powerful scenes in the movie and breaking it down to the elements that make it really shows me what the director was thinking about when he planed it out and shot it.


Sunday, October 16, 2011

Blog Assignment#5- Storyboard Imitation


The 180 degree rule says that two characters in the same scene should have the same left/right relationship with each other.  In the scene the camera is always to the right of the villain.  It never crosses the invisible line, which was between the villain and the vault mainly.  The shot never establishes any sort of connection between the villain and any citizens because he walks directly over to the vault to blow it up. 
Next is the rule of thirds and this says that you should imagine as divided into nine equal parts where the elements are placed on intersections.  In the first four shots it follows these guidelines.  The villain walks in on the left side of the screen. Then the next shot has the clicker on the left side.  Third shot is an over the shoulder shot with the villain taking up most of the left side of the screen.  The last shot doesn’t follow it because the villain was placed directly in the middle of the shot with the camera below looking up at him to add a dominance feeling. 
Last rule is the 30 degree rule and it states that the camera should move at least 30 degrees between shots of the same subject occurring over and over.  The script doesn’t break any rules for this.  Every shot is spread out between and never has reoccurring shots of the same subject.  There is no interaction between any characters in these shots so there wasn’t any repetition to cause the shot to break the 30 degree rule.
I feel like the camera locations were set up pretty well and that the scene would flow smoothly.  I think that the use and location of the camera are very important when laying out a shot and deciding how you want to shoot it and I don’t think there were any errors when laying this shot out.  

Blog Assignment#6-Animation Deconstruction





















The two pictures that I picked were both from the T.V. show Spongebob Squarepants.  The first picture of Spongebob and Patrick are running away from The Flying Dutchman.  The hues they chose were darker colors then the typical Spongebob style of color.  They picked to make it darker to add emphasis on the scariness of the scene.  They made the Flying Dutchman a brighter green then everything else so you can focus your eyes more towards him. The only shadows in this picture are the ones under both Spongebob and Patrick and those are there to show that they are running away from The Flying Dutchman and also show that they have “weight”.  Since the image is so dark it has affected the mood by making it an ominous feeling when the viewer looks at it.  The parallel lines in the image help you focus on Spongebob and Patrick while the tints of green help you focus your eyes on The Flying Dutchman at the same time. 
            Red, orange, and other strong colors were the hues chosen for the second picture.  They brought out the saturation of the background in the second picture to make the fire in the background have a stronger impact.  They also brought down the saturation on Spongebob and Patricks face to show how powerful the explosion was behind them and how bright it was.  It adds to the mood they are in because it makes them look much more intense than they normally are.  Spongebob overlaps Patrick in the second image, which allows you to focus on both of them.  There are no parallel lines in this image so that doesn’t help you focus so it relies on the use of overlapping movements.  Both Patricks arms and Spongebobs’ are angled toward their faces helping your eye movement toward them.
            These images use a completely different set of colors.  The hues used in the first image are blue and green which are both very cool colors that give you a sense of relaxation.  While the colors in the second image are red, orange, and yellow which all give you a sense of aggression and power.  These images are very different when compared to eachother.   

Blog Assignment#4-Song Deconstruction

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRUVa2OJsj4

Break The Chain- Lupe Fiasco
LISTENING FRAMEWORK
(SIMPLIFIED)

LISTENING PHASE 1 (Rhythm)

Tempo [slow, medium, fast]
Slow beginning turns into medium-fast

Source [where is the rhythm coming from?]
Electronic piano, drums, synthetic beats

Groove [describe how the personality of the rhythm]
Flow, pulse, behind the beat


LISTENING PHASE 2 (Arrangement)

Instrumentation [which instruments drive the song?]
Synthetic beat and drums

Structure/Organization [how is the song built? Order, patterns, etc.]
Chorus, Verse, Chorus, Verse, Chorus, Versus, Chorus, Synthetic beat solo, Chorus

Emotional Architecture [Draw how the song build and drop?]
 Lupes' voice raises and goes high while the piano beat builds then the drum drops


LISTENING PHASE 3 (Sound Quality)

Balance
- Height [high and low of frequency]
High pitch levels in chorus and it only goes higher, goes low only when rapping

- Width [stereo panning left/right]
All stays in middle

- Depth [layers of instruments - via loudness]
Piano, drums, then the synthetic beats over all



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFmLUBfU9I8

Til I Get There- Lupe Fiasco
LISTENING FRAMEWORK
(SIMPLIFIED)

LISTENING PHASE 1 (Rhythm)

Tempo [slow, medium, fast]
Medium

Source [where is the rhythm coming from?]
Drums, piano

Groove [describe how the personality of the rhythm]
Flow, pulse, behind beat, fun


LISTENING PHASE 2 (Arrangement)

Instrumentation [which instruments drive the song?]
Piano mainly then drums

Structure/Organization [how is the song built? Order, patterns, etc.]
Intro, Chorus, Verse, Chorus, Verse, Chorus, Piano and drum beat ending

Emotional Architecture [Draw how the song build and drop?]
 Steady beat stays throughout song but more sounds like piano and bass come in


LISTENING PHASE 3 (Sound Quality)

Balance
- Height [high and low of frequency]
High when chorus comes but low on verses

- Width [stereo panning left/right]
Doesn’t pan

- Depth [layers of instruments - via loudness]
Piano, beat, then outside voices and sounds included over



I chose “Break The Chain” and “Til I Get There” which are two songs I could listen to for hours straight.  Lupe Fiasco is the singer in both and it came out on his Lasers album.  The tempo for Break The Chain starts off very slow then ends up faster than Til I Get There after the intro ends. Break The Chain begins in an Adagio pace and ends in a Allegro while Til I Get There is Moderato throughout the whole song.  The song Break The Chain is emotional and the lyrics talk about how there’s so much drama in life and how “The Chain” keeps people together while Til I Get There has lyrics that focus more on how the music industry is taking over and taking power.  In both songs drums and the piano are the musical elements that drive the songs along with electronic beats.  Since both songs are by the same artist they also have the same groove.  Its always behind the beat and flows really well and makes it easy to enjoy. 
Break The Chain starts with not a lot of intensity then it builds up after the intro.  Til I Get There has more intensity throughout the whole song.  Both songs have a melody that is just so easy to get stuck in your head.  Lupe’s songs always have harmony so there’s never any spot in the song where it’s completely silent.  Lupe Fiasco’s organization in everyone of his songs is always very structured.  He normally structures it like in these songs with either his chorus first or second and usually has the chorus right after every verse spits.  Lupe relies on his chorus a lot and always has it so it won’t get out of your head after you listen to it.  His flow is unbeatable and his rhythm is untouchable.  I like Til I Get There more than Break the Chain because it is a more uplifting song.  I also like how catchy the melody is in it.  Basically from the listening framework sheet I see that both of these songs are very similar but they have a couple miniscule differences.

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Reflections on Sound Design

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LAXJPlpD4k




The scene uses one main use of the “Listening Modes” and that’s semantic sounds. Semantic sounds are representational sounds, which means sounds that aren’t literally happening but represent the action that is taking place.  So when Spongebob first pulls the pencil out and puts it up in the air you hear a sword being drawn out of its holster because that’s what it looks like.  They don’t include any causal sounds because this scene is meant to have a lot of action that Spongebob thinks is happening but actually isn’t.  And causal sounds are literal sounds taking place.
            This scene uses the “Gesalt Principals and Illusion” really well to make it a stronger piece.  They use the illusion technique by never having an overlap of sounds but they keep them constantly coming and never slowing down.  The sword being drawn, then the helicopter sound falling, then the wisps of writing so fast.  It’s a constant mess of sounds never overlapping just constantly going.  The figure and ground method was also used.  When the pencil is up in the air above his head there is a bright shining light hitting the pencil making you focus on it more than the background.  Its also a lot bigger than it was before it went up in the air.